In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Sau. Jiya vs. Kuldeep
The Supreme Court in Sau. Jiya vs. Kuldeep addresses divorce and alimony under the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing equitable settlements.
M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. vs. IRCON International Ltd.
The Supreme Court in M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. vs. IRCON International Ltd. upheld the enforceability of limitation clauses under the Arbitration Act.
Karan Singh vs State of Haryana
Supreme Court acquits Karan Singh in dowry death case, emphasizing lack of evidence under IPC Sections 304-B and 498-A.
Kuldeep Singh vs. The State of Punjab & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashes FIR against Kuldeep Singh, clarifying Exception 2 under Section 375 IPC regarding marital consent.
Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee Rep. by Its Secretary vs. The District Collector, Vellore District & Others
The Supreme Court reinforces the polluter pays principle in Vellore District, directing compensation for ecological damage caused by tanneries. Case: Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee.
Smt. N. Usha Rani and Anr. vs. Moodudula Srinivas
Supreme Court ruling on maintenance rights under Section 125 CrPC in Smt. N. Usha Rani vs. Moodudula Srinivas clarifies legal status of second marriages.
Suresh Chandra and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
In Suresh Chandra and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court emphasizes the need for conclusive evidence in dowry death cases, leading to acquittal.
LALITA VERSUS VISHWANATH & ORS.
In LALITA VERSUS VISHWANATH & ORS., the Supreme Court clarifies the legal standards for abetment of suicide under IPC, emphasizing the need for credible evidence.
Jasminbhai Bharatbhai Kothari vs. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court in Jasminbhai Bharatbhai Kothari vs. State of Gujarat clarifies the application of Order XXII Rule 5 of the SC Rules, 2013 regarding exemption from surrendering.
Parimal Kumar & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies eligibility criteria for teacher recruitment under RTE Act in Parimal Kumar & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
INOX AIR PRODUCTS LIMITED NOW KNOWN AS INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
The Supreme Court clarifies the definition of 'manufacture' under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in INOX AIR PRODUCTS LIMITED case, impacting drug licensing.
Ashok Saxena vs. The State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court clarifies the doctrine of transfer of malice under Section 301 IPC in Ashok Saxena vs. The State of Uttarakhand.