In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
M/S. GOKUL LAMP WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED ETC. VERSUS MYSORE LAMP WORKS LIMITED
Supreme Court clarifies post-award interest in M/S. Gokul Lamp Works case, ensuring timely payments and setting interest rates.
HARE KRUSHNAMAHANTA VERSUS HIMADARI SAHU & ANR.
Supreme Court enhances compensation for Hare Krushnamahanta under Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing just compensation principles.
Raja Khan vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Supreme Court in Raja Khan vs. State of Chhattisgarh clarifies the standards for circumstantial evidence under IPC. Key implications for legal practice.
Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.
The Supreme Court in Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana emphasizes the necessity of informing arrested individuals of grounds for arrest under Article 22(1).
MAYA SINGH AND OTHERS VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS
The Supreme Court reinstates higher compensation for Maya Singh in a motor accident case, emphasizing proper application of multiplier method.
DIGVIJAY LAXHAMSINH GAEKWAD (DANNY GAEKWAD) VERSUS SAPNA GOVIND RAO & ORS.
Supreme Court clarifies competing offers under SEBI Regulations in DIGVIJAY LAXHAMSINH GAEKWAD case, impacting public offers and investor rights.
.png)
TILKU ALIAS TILAK SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Supreme Court acquits Tilku Singh of IPC Sections 363 and 366 charges, emphasizing voluntary consent and age considerations in TILKU ALIAS TILAK SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND.
M/S S.R.S. TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKAR VERSUS THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS & ORS.
The Supreme Court in M/S S.R.S. TRAVELS v. KSRTC upholds the repeal of the Karnataka Contract Carriages Act and clarifies delegation of permit-granting powers.
GOPAL SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
The Supreme Court acquits Gopal Singh & Anr. in a murder case, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to establish identity. Key ruling in Gopal Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand.
Sanjay vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court quashes the death sentence in Sanjay vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, emphasizing the need for conclusive evidence in criminal cases.
P.M. Lokanath and Others vs. State of Karnataka and Another
In P.M. Lokanath vs. State of Karnataka, the Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of legal processes.
Union of India and another v. Tarsem Singh and others
The Supreme Court clarifies the applicability of solatium and interest under the NHAI Act in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, impacting land acquisition compensation.