In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Virinder Pal Singh vs. Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies the legality of disciplinary actions post-retirement in Virinder Pal Singh vs. Punjab and Sind Bank, emphasizing service regulations.
In Re: 2 Million Lives at Risk, Contamination in Jojari River, Rajasthan
Supreme Court mandates urgent measures for Jojari River restoration, emphasizing environmental rights under Article 21 in In Re: 2 Million Lives at Risk.
Union of India v. Prakash Industries Limited and Another
Supreme Court clarifies coal supply obligations under current policy in Union of India v. Prakash Industries, ensuring compliance with earlier orders.
Shiny C.J. & Ors. Versus Shalini Sreenivasan & Ors. Etc.
The Supreme Court in Shiny C.J. & Ors. clarified the eligibility of Anganwadi Workers for Supervisor posts under the ICDS, ensuring fair competition.
Rajendra & Ors vs. State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court overturns conviction under Section 376 IPC in Rajendra case, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence in sexual assault cases.
Mizo Chief Council Mizoram vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court ruled on the Mizo Chiefs' fundamental rights under Article 32, addressing land acquisition and compensation issues in Mizo Chief Council Mizoram vs. Union of India.
Raj Bahadur Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court upholds conviction under P.C. Act in Raj Bahadur Singh case, clarifying legal standards for corruption offenses.
Om Sakthi Sekar vs. V. Sukumar & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's remand for revaluation of auctioned properties in Om Sakthi Sekar vs. V. Sukumar, emphasizing fair recovery processes.
Sudhanshu Kardam vs. Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Ors.
Supreme Court ruling on employment eligibility under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, impacting candidates with mental illness.
(b)%20Court%20Clarifies%20Procedural%20Safeguards.png)
Manohar Lal vs. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies procedural safeguards under Article 311(2)(b) in Manohar Lal vs. Commissioner of Police, emphasizing the need for a valid inquiry.
Sanjay Kumar Sharma v. State of Bihar & Ors.
The Supreme Court in Sharma v. State of Bihar clarifies the legal weight of dying declarations in criminal cases, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny.
Harish Rana vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court ruled on the withdrawal of medical treatment under Article 21 in Harish Rana's case, emphasizing dignity and best interests.