In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Alka Shrirang Chavan & Anr. Vs. Hemchandra Rajaram Bhonsale & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in Alka Shrirang Chavan case.
Kishorilal (D) Thr. LRS & Ors. vs. Gopal & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies rules on legal representation and abatement in Kishorilal vs. Gopal, impacting future appeals in specific performance cases.
State of U.P. & Another vs. Dinesh Kumar
The Supreme Court ruled on the implications of non-disclosure of criminal cases in employment applications in State of U.P. vs. Dinesh Kumar, emphasizing integrity in public service.
Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association (Regd.) vs. M/S Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of execution against directors under the Consumer Protection Act in Ansal Crown Heights case.
Pogadadabnda Revathi & Anr. v. The State of Telangana
Supreme Court clarifies police custody limits under Section 167 in Pogadadabnda Revathi case, emphasizing the need for valid reasons when bail is in effect.
The State of Uttar Pradesh vs Anurudh & Anr
The Supreme Court clarifies the process for determining a victim's age under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the importance of statutory compliance in bail proceedings.
Yerram Vijay Kumar vs. The State of Telangana & Anr.
Supreme Court quashes proceedings under Section 448 of Companies Act in Yerram Vijay Kumar case, clarifying cognizance requirements.
X vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
Supreme Court cancels bail granted under POCSO Act, emphasizing the gravity of offences against minors in X vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh.
M/S JINDAL EQUIPMENT LEASING CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI – II, NEW DELHI
The Supreme Court clarifies tax implications of share substitution in amalgamation under Section 28 of the I.T. Act in Jindal Equipment case.
%20Clarified.png)
The Joint Director (Rayalaseema), Anti-Corruption Bureau, A.P. & Anr. vs. Dayam Pedarangarao & Anr.
Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Bureau under Section 2(s) of CrPC in The Joint Director vs. Dayam Pedarangarao.
%20Supreme%20Court's%20Ruling.png)
Ultratech Cement Ltd. vs. The State of Gujarat & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies definition of motor vehicles under Section 2(28) in Ultratech Cement Ltd. vs. The State of Gujarat, impacting tax liabilities.
Sumit Bansal vs M/s MGI Developers and Promoters
The Supreme Court reinstates a quashed complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act in Sumit Bansal vs MGI Developers, clarifying legal principles on cheque dishonour.