In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
CDR Yogesh Mahla vs. Union of India & Others
Supreme Court clarifies appeal rights under POSH Act in CDR Yogesh Mahla case, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness.
V.Anima Malar vs. S. Aadhavan & Ors.
Supreme Court dismisses writ petition as abuse of process in V.Anima Malar vs. S. Aadhavan, emphasizing ongoing civil suit.
Raj Singh Gehlot & Ors. vs. Amitabha Sen & Ors.
Supreme Court quashes orders on de-licensing land for commercial use, emphasizing adherence to Haryana Development Act in Raj Singh Gehlot case.
Neha Lal vs Abhishek Kumar
The Supreme Court dissolves marriage under Article 142 due to irretrievable breakdown in Neha Lal vs Abhishek Kumar, emphasizing judicial discretion.
Prakash Atlanta (JV) vs. National Highways Authority of India
The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of subsequent legislation in construction contracts, impacting the applicability of the BOCW Act and Cess Act.
Union of India & Others vs. Heavy Vehicles Factory Employees’ Union and Another
Supreme Court clarifies compensatory allowances' inclusion in overtime wages under Section 59 of the Factories Act in Union of India vs. Heavy Vehicles Factory Employees’ Union.
Gujarat Public Service Commission vs. Gnaneshwary Dushyantkumar Shah & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies that AICTE Regulations do not govern state recruitment processes for professors, affirming the validity of the Gujarat Public Service Commission's selection.
HT MEDIA LIMITED VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER DELHI SOUTH GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
Supreme Court clarifies service tax applicability on event management services in HT Media Limited case, impacting future tax assessments.
MD. FIROZ MANSURI & ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld the Bihar Pharmacist Cadre Rules, affirming the essential qualification of Diploma in Pharmacy for recruitment, impacting pharmacy professionals.
Airport Authority of India & Ors. vs. Sham Krishna B & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies the application of reservation policy in merit-based appointments in Airport Authority of India vs. Sham Krishna B.
Tulasareddi @ Mudakappa & Anr. vs. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
The Supreme Court in Tulasareddi case clarifies legal standards for conviction under IPC, emphasizing the necessity of strong evidence and the presumption of innocence.
Amit Kumar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court mandates FIR registration for student suicides, emphasizing institutional responsibility in mental health support.