In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court upholds conviction for conscious possession of narcotics in Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh.
Irfan Alias Bhayu Mevati vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court remands Irfan Alias Bhayu Mevati case for a fair trial, emphasizing the need for expert testimony on DNA evidence.
BISWAJIT DAS VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Supreme Court clarifies limits of judicial discretion under Article 142 in BISWAJIT DAS VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, impacting future appeals.
Om Prakash Ambadkar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies the judicial oversight required in FIR registration under Section 156(3) in Om Prakash Ambadkar vs. The State of Maharashtra.
Rajeev Kalita vs. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court mandates adequate toilet facilities in all courts, emphasizing the right to sanitation under Article 21 in Rajeev Kalita vs. Union of India.
Dharmendrakumar Singh & Ors. v. The Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand & Ors.
Supreme Court affirms promotion rights for Jharkhand judicial officers in Dharmendrakumar Singh v. The Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand.
Dr. Sharmad v. State of Kerala and Others
In Dr. Sharmad v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court clarifies promotion criteria for medical faculty under G.O. dated 07 April 2008, impacting eligibility standards.
NBCC (INDIA) LTD. VERSUS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Supreme Court clarifies that registration under MSMED Act is not mandatory for dispute resolution under Section 18 in NBCC vs. State of West Bengal.
Rina Kumari @ Rina Devi @ Reena vs. Dinesh Kumar Mahto @ Dinesh Kumar Mahato and another
The Supreme Court clarifies maintenance rights under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Rina Kumari vs. Dinesh Kumar Mahto, emphasizing women's protection.
Bhupal Singh & Anr. vs. State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court quashes dowry death conviction in Bhupal Singh & Anr. case, emphasizing lack of evidence under IPC Sections 304B and 498A.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. VERSUS PAM DEVELOPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
Supreme Court clarifies continuous cause of action under CPC in State of West Bengal v. PAM Developments, impacting amendment applications.
Sadashiv Dhondiram Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court clarifies the admissibility of extra-judicial confessions under Section 25 of the Evidence Act in Sadashiv Dhondiram Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra.