In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Mahadeo Krishna Naik
Supreme Court ruling on Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation's liability and back wages for Mahadeo Krishna Naik. Key implications for labor law.
JSW Steel Ltd. vs. The Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Trust & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies liability for wreck removal under Section 14 of the Indian Ports Act in JSW Steel Ltd. vs. The Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Trust.
Tapas Kumar Palit vs. State of Chhattisgarh
In Tapas Kumar Palit vs. State of Chhattisgarh, the Supreme Court emphasizes the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, granting bail to the appellant.
Ramesh Mishrilal Jain vs. Avinash Vishwanath Patne & Anr.
The Supreme Court in Ramesh Mishrilal Jain vs. Avinash Vishwanath Patne clarifies the applicability of stamp duty on agreements under the Bombay Stamp Act.
M/S. B N PADMANABHAIAH AND SONS VERSUS R N NADIGAR & ORS.
The Supreme Court clarifies the locus standi in representative suits in M/S. B N Padmanabhaiah and Sons v. R N Nadigar & Ors., emphasizing the need for direct interest.
Vinod @ Nasmulla vs. The State of Chhattisgarh
Supreme Court acquits Vinod @ Nasmulla in dacoity case, emphasizing the need for reliable evidence. Key insights from the judgment.
Puja Ferro Alloys P Ltd. v. State of Goa and Ors.
Supreme Court rules on the entitlement of electricity tariff rebate under Section 23 in Puja Ferro Alloys P Ltd. v. State of Goa.
The Union of India Through the Assistant Director vs. Kanhaiya Prasad
The Supreme Court reinforces mandatory bail conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA in The Union of India vs. Kanhaiya Prasad, emphasizing the seriousness of money laundering.
Ramesh A. Naika vs. The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka
Supreme Court in Ramesh A. Naika case commutes death penalty to life imprisonment, emphasizing circumstantial evidence and mitigating factors.
M/s. Tomorrowland Limited vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited and Another
Supreme Court ruling in M/s. Tomorrowland Limited vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited clarifies contractual obligations and forfeiture of payments.
Vinod Kumar vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
In Vinod Kumar vs State, the Supreme Court quashed the conviction under IPC Section 302 due to insufficient circumstantial evidence.
CHIEF MANAGER OF RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VERSUS HANEEF KHAN
Supreme Court clarifies limits on back wages under the Industrial Disputes Act in CHIEF MANAGER OF RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VERSUS HANEEF KHAN.