In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Karam Singh vs Amarjit Singh & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies limitation periods for possession claims in Karam Singh vs Amarjit Singh, emphasizing the importance of title in CPC.
Manorma Sinha & Anr. vs. The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Anr.
Supreme Court clarifies compensation calculation under M.V. Act in Manorma Sinha case, enhancing total compensation to Rs. 74,43,631.
Pradyumna Mukund Kokil vs. Nashik Municipal Corporation and Others
Supreme Court clarifies compensation assessment under Section 26 in Kokil case, emphasizing statutory compliance and rental compensation.
Varun Kumar Alias Sonu vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Supreme Court upholds conviction under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376, and 377 in Varun Kumar Alias Sonu case, emphasizing victim's testimony.
Reshma vs. Dajibakrishnalad & Anr.
Supreme Court enhances compensation for Reshma in a motor vehicle accident case, emphasizing the need for just compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act.
Alan Mervyn Arthur Stephenson vs J. Xavier Jayarajan
Supreme Court rules on limitation period for arbitration claims in Stephenson case, emphasizing timely action under the Arbitration Act.
The Assam Financial Corporation Limited & Ors. vs. Bhabendranath Sarma & Ors.
Supreme Court rules on gratuity ceiling under Payment of Gratuity Act in The Assam Financial Corporation Limited case, impacting employee rights.
Kachara Vahatuk Sharamik Sangh vs. Ajoy Mehta & Ors.
Supreme Court addresses BMC's non-compliance in Kachara Vahatuk Sharamik Sangh case, emphasizing employee rights and statutory obligations.
Rahul Agarwal vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Rahul Agarwal vs. The State of West Bengal, the Supreme Court clarifies the legal standing on voice sample collection under Cr.P.C. and BNSS, impacting criminal investigations.
S.K. Jain vs. Union of India & Anr.
Supreme Court clarifies substitution of conviction under Section 63 of the Army Act in S.K. Jain vs. Union of India, impacting military discipline.
G. PRASAD RAGHAVAN vs. UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY
Supreme Court quashes charges against G. Prasad Raghavan under IPC Section 420, clarifying liability and discharge under Section 239.
Ravi Oraon vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
The Supreme Court in Ravi Oraon vs. The State of Jharkhand clarifies eligibility criteria for teacher recruitment, emphasizing natural justice and proper calculation of marks.