In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Gobind Singh and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies adverse possession claims against the State in Gobind Singh case, emphasizing legal boundaries and procedural adherence.
West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. Adhunik Power & Natural Resource Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies compensation for Change in Law events under PPA in West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs. Adhunik Power.
Torrent Power Ltd. vs. Ashish Arjunkumar Rathi & Others
The Supreme Court affirms the Committee of Creditors' decision in Torrent Power Ltd. case, emphasizing the non-justiciability of commercial wisdom under IBC.
Bhagyalaxmi Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs. Babaldas Amtharam Patel (D) Through Legal Representatives & Others
Supreme Court clarifies surety liability under Section 133 of the Indian Contract Act in Bhagyalaxmi Co-Operative Bank Ltd. case.
Union of India & Ors. v. Larsen & Tubro Limited (L&T)
Supreme Court clarifies limits on interest awards under Arbitration Act in Union of India v. L&T, modifying post-award interest rate.
Dr. Jiji K.S. & Ors. vs. Shibu K & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies promotion eligibility under AICTE regulations in Dr. Jiji K.S. case, impacting academic appointments.
ICICI Bank Limited vs. Era Infrastructure (India) Limited & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies simultaneous insolvency proceedings under IBC in ICICI Bank vs. Era Infrastructure. Key implications for creditors and debtors.
.png)
SUHAS CHAKMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Supreme Court mandates reforms in Open Correctional Institutions to enhance rehabilitation and dignity for prisoners in Suhas Chakma v. Union of India.
The General Secretary, Vivekananda Kendra vs. Pradeep Kumar Agarwalla and Others
Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between lease and license in property rights in The General Secretary, Vivekananda Kendra vs. Pradeep Kumar Agarwalla.
The State of Kerala & Anr. v. M/s. Panacea Biotec Ltd. & Anr.
Supreme Court clarifies jurisdictional requirements for misbranding cases under the Drugs Act in State of Kerala v. Panacea Biotec.
Ogeppa (D) Through LRS. vs. Sahebgouda (D) Through LRS. and Others
Supreme Court clarifies hereditary pujari rights in Ogeppa case, emphasizing the importance of documentary evidence and historical context.
M/S HAMDARD (WAKF) LABORATORIES VERSUS COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P. COMMERCIAL
The Supreme Court clarifies the classification of Sharbat Rooh Afza under UPVAT, ruling it as a fruit drink liable for 4% VAT, not 12.5%.