In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
State of Haryana & Others Versus Aalamgir & Others
Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition standards under Section 24 in State of Haryana vs Aalamgir, impacting future compensation claims.
Tr. A. Babu vs. State of Tamil Nadu
The Supreme Court modifies the sentence of A. Babu under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing the importance of restitution for misappropriated funds.
Parminder Singh vs. Honey Goyal and Others
The Supreme Court enhances compensation for Parminder Singh in a landmark ruling under the Motor Vehicles Act, addressing disability and future prospects.
Yogesh Kumar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Supreme Court rules on salary claims for Stenographers in Yogesh Kumar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh, affirming rights under Article 226.
THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATION VERSUS NAVROZ KERSASP MODY & ORS.
The Supreme Court clarifies environmental clearance requirements under the NGT Act in THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATION VERSUS NAVROZ KERSASP MODY & ORS.
Gangubai Raghunath Ayare vs Gangaram Sakharam Dhuri (D) Thr. LRs and Ors.
The Supreme Court in Gangubai Raghunath Ayare vs Gangaram Sakharam Dhuri affirmed the validity of a sale deed under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act.
VISHNOO MITTAL …APPELLANT VERSUS M/S SHAKTI TRADING COMPANY …RESPONDENT
Supreme Court in Vishnoo Mittal clarifies that IBC moratorium protects directors from NI Act proceedings. Key implications for corporate law.
Madivalappa v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
The Supreme Court in Madivalappa v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation enhances compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, emphasizing future earnings.
Shivaleela and Others vs. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others
Shivaleela and Others vs. The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. addresses compensation calculation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
RANJIT SARKAR vs. RAVI GANESH BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS
Supreme Court clarifies Section 256 of CrPC in Ranjit Sarkar case, emphasizing proper interpretation and implications for complainants.
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
The Supreme Court in Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat clarifies the mandatory nature of FIR registration under Section 154 CrPC.
THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATION VERSUS NATASHA STOREY
Supreme Court in THE AUROVILLE FOUNDATION VERSUS NATASHA STOREY affirms the legal authority of the Auroville Foundation, emphasizing the importance of statutory compliance.