In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
Ishwar Chanda Sharma vs. Devendra Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies standards for appointing receivers in temple management under Order XL, impacting ongoing litigations in Mathura.
Shrichand Rajaram Kukreja and Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
The Supreme Court quashed an FIR against Shrichand Kukreja, ruling it was a civil dispute misused for criminal proceedings. Key implications for legal practice.
Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited Versus Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies duty exemption eligibility for crude degummed soyabean oil under Notification 53/2003 in Noble Resources case.
Vijaya Bank & Anr. v. Prashant B Narnaware
The Supreme Court in Vijaya Bank v. Prashant B Narnaware upheld liquidated damages in employment contracts, clarifying public policy and restraint of trade.
Tukesh Singh & Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court in Tukesh Singh & Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh emphasizes the necessity of eyewitness identification for establishing guilt in criminal cases.
M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
Supreme Court in M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA affirms jurisdiction of Delhi Arbitration Centre under MSMED Act, overriding Arbitration Act.
Brig Sandeep Chaudhary vs Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies promotion criteria under Army regulations in Brig Sandeep Chaudhary vs Union of India, impacting military personnel evaluations.
The State of Telangana & Ors. vs. Dr. Pasupuleti Nirmala Hanumantha Rao Charitable Trust
Supreme Court clarifies land allotment conditions under Telangana Land Revenue Act in The State of Telangana vs. Dr. Pasupuleti Nirmala Hanumantha Rao Charitable Trust.
THE HP POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS M/S BRUA HYDROWATT PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Supreme Court clarifies liability for Bay construction costs under Electricity Act in THE HP POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. case.
LAL MOHD. & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
In Lal Mohd. & Anr. v. State of U.P., the Supreme Court quashed an FIR under the UP Gangsters Act, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence.
Rajesh Chaddha vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court acquits Rajesh Chaddha under Section 498A IPC, highlighting the need for specific allegations in dowry-related cases.
Thirunagalingam vs. Lingeswaran & Anr.
The Supreme Court clarifies the principles governing condonation of delay under CPC in Thirunagalingam vs. Lingeswaran & Anr., emphasizing the need for sufficient cause.