Sunday, April 19, 2026
info@thelawobserver.in

Supreme Court Judgments

In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions

Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Where FIR and Chargesheet Disclose No Strong Suspicion or Essential Ingredients of Offences

Tuhin Kumar Biswas @ Bumba v. State of West Bengal, Criminal Appeal No. 5146 of 2025

The Supreme Court quashes criminal proceedings in a property dispute, holding that FIR allegations under Sections 341, 354C, and 506 IPC disclosed no strong suspicion, and reiterates discharge principles under Section 227 CrPC. Supreme Court Explains Discharge Standards and Misuse of Criminal Process in Property Disputes

Supreme Court of India

Integrated Textile Processing Using Power Bars Excise Exemption: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of “Manufacture” Under the Central Excise Act

Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot v. Narsibhai Karamsibhai Gajera & Ors.,

The Supreme Court clarifies that excise duty exemption for cotton fabrics is unavailable where any integral stage of an integrated manufacturing process uses power, even if carried out across separate units. Legal Judgment Explainer

Supreme Court of India

Slum Land Cannot Be Acquired When Owner’s Preferential Right to Redevelop Remains Intact

Jyoti Builders v. Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. (2025 INSC 1372)

Supreme Court holds that rehabilitation of slum dwellers does not confer land rights on developers; land acquisition under the Slum Act cannot proceed without first extinguishing the landowner’s preferential right and following statutory procedure.

Supreme Court of India

Conviction May Be Sustained While Sentence Is Reduced to Period Already Undergone Where Proportionality and Subsequent Settlement Justify Leniency

Venkatesh & Another v. State represented by the Inspector of Police (2025 INSC 1383)

Supreme Court upholds conviction but reduces sentence to period already undergone, holding that proportionality, substantial incarceration, and subsequent settlement can justify leniency at the sentencing stage.

Supreme Court of India

Contractual Interest in Bill Discounting Transactions Must Be Enforced Unless Shown to Be Penal, Unconscionable, or Contrary to Public Policy: Supreme Court

BPL Limited v. Morgan Securities and Credits Private Limited (2025 INSC 1380)

Supreme Court upholds enforceability of high contractual interest in bill discounting transactions, clarifying Section 31(7) Arbitration Act, public policy limits, and commercial autonomy in arbitration.