In-depth analysis and explainers of landmark Supreme Court decisions
The Authority for Advance Rulings (Income Tax) and Others vs. Tiger Global International II Holdings
Supreme Court clarifies tax sovereignty in capital gains taxation involving Mauritius entities, impacting treaty benefits and tax avoidance.
Kanchana Rai vs. Geeta Sharma & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies maintenance rights of widowed daughters-in-law under Hindu law in Kanchana Rai vs. Geeta Sharma.
The State of Haryana vs. Krishan Kumar & Ors.
The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot impose additional qualifications for Drug Inspectors, affirming central authority under the D&C Act.
Sujata Bora v. Coal India Limited & Ors.
Supreme Court ruling on disability rights under RPwD Act in Sujata Bora case emphasizes reasonable accommodation and equal opportunity.
Dinesh Biwaji Ashtikar vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Supreme Court emphasizes the importance of Section 12 of the RTE Act for inclusive education, directing effective implementation for disadvantaged children.
Alka Shrirang Chavan & Anr. Vs. Hemchandra Rajaram Bhonsale & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in Alka Shrirang Chavan case.
Kishorilal (D) Thr. LRS & Ors. vs. Gopal & Ors.
Supreme Court clarifies rules on legal representation and abatement in Kishorilal vs. Gopal, impacting future appeals in specific performance cases.
State of U.P. & Another vs. Dinesh Kumar
The Supreme Court ruled on the implications of non-disclosure of criminal cases in employment applications in State of U.P. vs. Dinesh Kumar, emphasizing integrity in public service.
Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association (Regd.) vs. M/S Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of execution against directors under the Consumer Protection Act in Ansal Crown Heights case.
Pogadadabnda Revathi & Anr. v. The State of Telangana
Supreme Court clarifies police custody limits under Section 167 in Pogadadabnda Revathi case, emphasizing the need for valid reasons when bail is in effect.
The State of Uttar Pradesh vs Anurudh & Anr
The Supreme Court clarifies the process for determining a victim's age under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the importance of statutory compliance in bail proceedings.
Yerram Vijay Kumar vs. The State of Telangana & Anr.
Supreme Court quashes proceedings under Section 448 of Companies Act in Yerram Vijay Kumar case, clarifying cognizance requirements.